How Workforce Proficiency Drives Organizational Agility
Industrial organizations that invest in mapping workforce proficiency to ever-changing market demands are pulling ahead.
Industrial organizations that invest in mapping workforce proficiency to ever-changing market demands are pulling ahead.
Industrial businesses are remarkably agile. Each day, they compete to deliver innovative new products and services to market… as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible. To pull this off, they run extremely complex operations with thousands of moving people, processes, and parts. They must also navigate many potential sources of friction in their operation, such as supply shortages, quality issues, aging equipment, changing regulations or pandemics (to name a few). These sources of friction can be a drag on agility, aka the ability to respond to change.
Based on thousands of conversations with industrial businesses, we know that one major source of friction is the proficiency of the workforce (or lack thereof). What does it mean to have a proficient workforce? It means that your team has the right mix of skills to complete the required workload on time / to quality / to safety. Workforce proficiency is critical to workforce productivity and labor optimization.
There’s a lot to unpack here, so let’s dive in. Imagine one of those two-sided balance scales. On one side, you have the workload. On the other side, you have the workforce. To maximize workforce productivity, the goal is to balance the scale — meaning you have the right mix of skills to complete the required workload. In any given period, the scale is hard to balance because both sides are constantly changing...
How does the workload change? Several examples:
How does the workforce change? Several examples:
How does an organization dynamically balance workload and workforce?
As many manufacturers are discovering, maintaining a proficient workforce based on the workload is getting harder. But in order to rebalance and respond to change, they must:
This sounds straightforward, but it is difficult in practice because MOST organizations are still using spreadsheet-based skill matrices. However, most business and frontline leaders do NOT rely on these matrices because the data is stale and hard to access. This makes it nearly impossible to:
Also, many organizations rely on manual/offline training and evaluation processes. This means: 1) processes can be inconsistent or subjective 2) there is limited real-time visibility into progress 3) it’s difficult to manage timelines 4) qualifications do not incorporate work experience. This makes it nearly impossible to:
Needless to say, offline/manual solutions leave a lot left to be desired. Fortunately, industrial businesses are problem solvers, and they’re increasingly investing in new digital solutions to be more agile.
What are the essential functions of a viable digital solution?
For swiftly filling skill gaps by training or cross-training:
For knowing who can (and cannot) do what work and determining skills gaps:
Takeaways
Industrial businesses are remarkably agile, but many are struggling to maintain proficient workforces. Unfortunately, it’s impacting their ability to maintain production levels, to grow, and to pursue new market opportunities (1). Fortunately, organizations will do what they do best in order to be competitive — solve problems. In this case, we’re seeing increased investment in digital solutions that can help drive workforce productivity and rebalance the scale.
Supervisors face a tough challenge: making complex assignment decisions in a short time before each shift. In this blog, we'll delve into the intricacies of this task and explore how different factors can impact shift outcomes.
Turmoil in the market and rising inflation have the potential to impact manufacturing unit economics across the board. It’s at times like these where understanding business operations and the efficient use of assets can make a big difference. As it relates to managing a manufacturing workforce, plant leaders can get leverage out of better quantifying and then maximizing skill coverage. In this blog post, we discuss coverage optimization as a source of cost-savings : improved overtime management and decreased costs of poor quality (COPQ).